|
05/23/07
Justice Dept. orders release of documents over erasure of
Scalia speech
HATTIESBURG, Miss. (AP) -- The Justice Department has ordered
the release of documents to a Hattiesburg newspaper related
to the Marshals Service's investigation into the erasing of
recordings of a speech by Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
The order came Tuesday, more than two years after the Hattiesburg
American appealed the Marshals Service's refusal to allow
access to records pertaining to the seizure of tapes of Scalia's
speech at Presbyterian Christian School in Hattiesburg in
April 2004.
The Associated Press and the Hattiesburg American ended their
litigation against the Marshals Service in September 2004.
The government had conceded in a filing on Sept. 10, 2004,
that the Marshals Service violated federal law when a deputy
marshal ordered reporters to erase their recordings of Scalia's
speech.
During the April 7 speech, a deputy federal marshal, Melanie
Rube, demanded that AP reporter Denise Grones and Hattiesburg
American reporter Antoinette Konz erase recordings of the
justice's remarks. The reporters had not been told before
the speech that they could not use tape recorders.
When Grones resisted, the marshal took the digital recorder
out of her hands. The reporter then showed Rube how to erase
the recording.
Rube then reached across Grones and demanded that Konz hand
over her tape. Konz surrendered the tape and, after the speech,
was able to get it back only after she erased the recording
in front of the marshal.
The marshal said she acted at the direction of Scalia.
The exchange occurred in the front row of the school auditorium
while Scalia spoke on the Constitution. Scalia later apologized
and said he would make it clear in the future that recording
his remarks for the use of the print media would not be a
problem.
The newspaper had requested a copy of the final report related
to the investigation, transcripts of interviews conducted
during the investigation and guidelines for handling the media
provided to agents who provide security for judicial officers.
On Tuesday, Janice McLeod, associate director of the Department
of Justice's Office of Information and Privacy, said the Marshals
Service acted inappropriately when it denied the newspaper
access to investigation records.
Leonard Van Slyke of Jackson, the newspaper's attorney, said
the appeal took too long.
"This is the epitome of bureaucratic inefficiency that
a one-page letter took two years and three months to generate,"
Van Slyke said.
Despite delays, Van Slyke said the information pertaining
to the investigation is still worth receiving, adding that
the public needs to know what happened in the investigation
and what its findings were.
"Leonard is absolutely right that this decision took
way too long," said Kathleen Williams, executive editor
of the Hattiesburg American. "But we are delighted with
the outcome. There is a clear public interest in getting this
material. The Marshals Service should expedite getting these
records to us."
___
Information from: Hattiesburg American, http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com
|